IN THE Supreme court OF new Zealand	
 
[2015] NZSC 130	

BETWEEN	
JOHN KENNETH SLAVICH
Applicant	

AND	
THE JUDGES OF THE SUPREME COURT
Respondent	

     	
     	

Court:	
Elias CJ, William Young, Glazebrook, Arnold and O'Regan JJ	

Counsel:	
Applicant in person	

Judgment:	
1 September 2015	

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

The application for review is dismissed.
____________________________________________________________________

REASONS
[1]	Mr Slavich applies for a review, under s 28(3) of the Supreme Court Act 2003, of William Young J’s judgment of 11 August 2015.
[2]	In that judgment William Young J upheld the Registrar’s decision to refuse to accept for filing an application for leave to appeal against a decision of 3 July 2015 of Venning J.
[3]	Mr Slavich submits that William Young J’s decision was erroneous because it did not deal with the correct ground of recusal or with the grounds for reviewing the Registrar’s decision relating to s 8(c) of the Supreme Court Act.  It also did not take into account the alleged fact that the High Court decision declaring Mr Slavich a vexatious litigant should be treated as a nullity by this Court. 
[4]	The question dealt with in William Young J’s decision was whether this Court has jurisdiction to deal with Mr Slavich’s application.  None of the matters raised in the application for review by Mr Slavich are relevant to that point.
[5]	We agree with William Young J, for the reasons he gives, that there was no jurisdiction.
[6]	The application for review is accordingly dismissed.